No skips, no shuffles

Friday, September 21, 2007


Luciano Berio
Sinfonia

In that long and weary conversation I will have forever, where I ask myself if I belong more to academic or pop music, I find the “modernist” stuff I studied and loved so much at Uni acts as a grateful gap between the different discourses…where I find myself having been too concerned with enjoying luscious tunes and arrangements or looking for a little more depth – I am not alone in this and being boomeranged in my head from one to the other suits me, despite growing maturing realisations that binary is no way forward. I sang a Stockhausen song cycle with Paul, he lent me a CD of Stimmung – I remembered well those avant-garde bits of Beatlemusic I had loved and tried to emulate as a teenager (microphone out of the window on fireworks night) and somehow in my first year at University I found myself in a avant-garde vocal ensemble. I set some choice bits of Macbeth (with varying success, although it led me to a still-held interest in sign-language), and then a few of us were asked to be the singers in a University performance of Sinfonia. Roger Marsh gave us all access to the enormous, huge A2 score and a CD.

The University department had a listening room, and one day in March I went with the CD and the score to put the headphones on and try to work out what I would be singing. I was the second alto out of eight singers and only just getting to grips with new methods of notation demanded by this scary music I was finding; Cage, Maxwell Davies, Marsh himself…I was going through big personal changes at the time anyway and this piece underlined how far I was coming and changing and learning…

The third movement always the most glorious, family members didn’t understand or appreciate it, friends at the time didn’t get it either, but the singers were all hideously involved and full of it – I have memories of Roger Marsh leading vocal rehearsal with the eight of us and managing to perform each of the parts. The mixture of singing, speech, bizarre noises and grunts…frightening snippets of texts (somewhere in the waiting you never realised you were waiting all alone)…and that amazing part where the strings play col legno, the singers all whisper a solfeggio part…the sea-sick feeling of it – the most tuneful of all your Romantic fudge suddenly clashing with parts of Beckett, the 1968 Parisian student slogans, Levi Strauss (who I still haven’t read but keep encountering the book in question, le Crut et le cruit in other texts…I tried The Unnameable – or at least a part of it in France, cribbed over Dan’s shoulder – he was reading that while I was finishing Finnegan’s Wake – if this noise would stop there would be nothing more to say).

The first movement is unsettling, the second attempting a stretch of calm…the words “Martin Luther King” stretched out almost unbearably across bars and bars and voices and voices (they don’t know who they are either – somewhere I have a recording of this, me singing, pointing, laughing and weeping along with Sarah, Kerry, Rachel, Paul, Hugo, Steve and…I fail to remember the other bass singer’s voice…but somewhere in the noise I scream out “Say it again – LOUDER!”) – the fourth, weakly, the fifth, long and unsettling piano solo…scribed in my memory for its impossible time signatures…Roger Marsh (again) led a composition module I took part in, and for a never-performed song-cycle I wrote I remember him instructing the drummer that the rhythms I wanted were something feel rather than intellectualise – funny that this seemed the only way through this piece…to intellectualise Sinfonia is a deeply troubling experience (all of this can’t stop the wars, can’t make the old younger or lower the price of bread can’t erase solitude or dull the tread outside my door, but yes it’s true, there’s no need to laugh, to point…if tomorrow we hear “another piece” made the tulips grow in my garden or altered the flow of ocean currents, we must believe it’s true) – it seems that, maybe to people outside the cocoon of academic music, it must seem overly-intellectualised, in itself, part of itself. Perhaps it is the emotional connection with such music that makes it possible is the more difficult to grasp – it is a strange emotional connection based as it is, initially, in mechanics. How do you become emotionally attached to a series of signals? And yet we do – although the ice-pick-nature of classical music has long held me in place, it is an emotional reaction nonetheless. Architecture = frozen music etc.

The fifth movement, I remember now, is made of elements, memories and ghosts of the other movements. Kate Bush does a similar thing on (maybe) my favourite song of hers ever…although it’s not a song…the part of Hounds of Love which constitutes a heavily-sedated tour of the album thus far and yet to come. The ending of the third movement has always frightened me of being a memory from an early nightmare…I remember stories of long-legged, hairy monsters, long arms, walking across a desert landscape towards a camp-fire where our heroes or protagonists are settling down for what they think will be a quiet night. My nightmares and fears have always focused around the concurrence of a natural, elemental disaster and the mistaken belief of a quiet night safe from such harm.

Thursday, September 06, 2007


Love
The Beatles

This came out last Christmas, right? George Martin got it together and mixed and juxtaposed all sorts of Beatle stuff…in a way it’s the perfect end to the Beatle binge (which I’ll confess had a huge gap and pause within). At first I had thought this would be a real mix, in the style of the Gray Album (DJ Dangermouse? He’s part of Gnarls Berkely I think…) in the sense of “new” songs being made from the remnants, and to some extent this happens but not everywhere…it’s more like the same songs but with embellishments taken from others…I’m sure the tracks have been cleaned up a little too. Or like the version of Strawberry Fields, the mix of which I recognise from that amazing South Bank Show/George Martin thing where he sat and mixed and remixed all those songs we knew so well to bring out this part, or draw attention to that line…I think that taught me an awful lot about how to mix a song, even though I’m constantly catching up with machinery and the more tech-y aspects of it all…the elements of music, the Lego blocks of it stacked and regulated in the right colour at the right time is always the starting point of it all – I’ve been mixing nuclear war songs at the mo and thinking about how tempting it can be to disguise or hide a weak musical moment or element with effects. The technology that allows the act of recording in the first place is, I suppose as ambivalent a force as all technology (Edward Bond)…I mean this isn’t to turn into a good or evil weighty thing, it’s just bloody Beatles songs remixed (not in the style of stars on 45 which I have had much fun reading about over the years in a book about the history of sampling which, in honour of Jive Bunny, titles the chapter about such party mixes as “Myxomatosis”) and it’s so nice the way that the chronology is artfully fucked with…hence you get “I want to hold your hand” coming after “While my guitar gently weeps”… Strawberry Fields is incredible again (so many of these songs are in danger of being dulled to nothing but jingles through overuse) and nearly overwhelms me to the point where I’m late for work on one of my morning walks to Southmead. It seems strange that this should be so good, it should have been terrible by the law of whatever these laws are…

Monday, September 03, 2007


The Beatles
Abbey Road

The blues appear again…the Revolution in the Head statement about inability to turn music history backwards and return authentically to the origin…that must be where development comes in. That must be how genres and styles mould themselves. I used to sing Come Together at Yo Sushi and it became more lounge than expected previously. What a strange opening song really, I expected it to be “Something” first…I’m tired, this album isn’t exciting me. The harmonies and strings sound so sophisticated though, and I feel that (although I’m taking my time over it admittedly, surely this was the point of this whole chronological/alphabetical binge in the first place) I understand the growth of George Harrison’s songwriting all the way from “Don’t bother me” to this…

While as ever I admire the use of language and sound of the words in Maxwell’s Silver Hammer, I feel irritated by everything…perhaps I’m too tired to write about this now, but I can also understand (also, perhaps for the first time) why people don’t like this. I hope the feeling doesn’t last. I’m also aware of a little Moog counterpoint going on. That irritates me too. Just because you have a new toy and all…although part of genius is genius losing its way, part of genius must involve not being a fucking prick about things…and then Oh Darling appears…fight the urge to take headphones off…what is the attraction to this song? This style? Lyrically…musically…I would have to walk out of a gig if some-one played it and if a suitor began declaring his feelings in this way I would have to close the door. And I want you…I’m not enjoying this…and I have to confess the next few songs disappear in a blur until You never give me your money…I find the music making little sense now…is this the outcome of too many albums of theirs so close head to head and back to back? Golden Slumbers is glorious. The shortness of the songs…is it a virtue? Is it not being hung-up on some golden three-minute rule or is it just turning them out? I don’t know how I feel about short songs and wonder if the desire for more is sometimes the point. This is a short entry.